I wish i wasnt a christian

So i had a “christain” meeting some days ago, and my christian leader made mention of a show titled, “i wish i wasnt a christian”. First thought on my mind was, this guy has lost his mind. I raised my head, looked around and the expression on the faces of other members said it all…..they were solidly behind me. He then explained the angle he was coming from and suddenly it all made sense. The way i see it, I wish i wasnt a christian depicts an understanding of those christians who want to let loose…..those christains who want to do certain things their friends do, wanna meet the opposite sex, ride exquisite cars, smoke, drink, party, flex in general. But being a christian, restricts this WANTS…..it restricts this urge to try something new, the urge to SIN.
Now, i am not going to act all holy and stuff….and pretend i wasnt in the above category. At first it wasnt easy. I felt alone, trying to resist temptations and all….but immediately my christian group leader explained what he meant by the title “i wish i wasnt a christian”…..i realized that being a christian doesnt mean you cant catch fun….doesnt mean u cant approach girls, doesnt mean you cant date, doesnt mean you cant drink, doesnt mean you cant party, etc……We christians can do all this things but we have to do them the good way. We have to respect God and put him first when we do these things. You can date a nice christian girl without all the sexual grips; You can drink but not get drunk…..amin, even Jesus turned water to wine; You can party with your christian friends and catch fun generally. And thats the beauty of being a christian. Having fun while doing the right things. Thats the christian way.


I was having a late lunch/early dinner while on the go not long ago. As I sat down, the first thing I noticed about the person serving me was that he had a talent. Within a few minutes, I told him so. In the brief, 20 or 30 minutes I sat eating the meal I ordered and he provided me the food to do…

Homosexuality! Harmful to the society?

YES!! In the sense that….

Calling something marriage does not make it marriage. Marriage has always been a covenant between a man and a woman which is by its nature ordered toward the procreation and education of children and the unity and wellbeing of the spouses.
The promoters of same-sex “marriage” propose something entirely different. They propose the union between two men or two women. This denies the self-evident biological, physiological, and psychological differences between men and women which find their complementarity in marriage. It also denies the specific primary purpose of marriage: the perpetuation of the human race and the raising of children.
Two entirely different things cannot be considered the same thing.

Marriage is not just any relationship between human beings. It is a relationship rooted in human nature and thus governed by natural law. Natural law’s most elementary precept is that “good is to be done and pursued, and evil is to be avoided.” By his natural reason, man can perceive what is morally good or bad for him. Thus, he can know the end or purpose of each of his acts and how it is morally wrong to transform the means that help him accomplish an act into the act’s purpose.
Any situation which institutionalizes the circumvention of the purpose of the sexual act violates natural law and the objective norm of morality.
Being rooted in human nature, natural law is universal and immutable. It applies to the entire human race, equally. It commands and forbids consistently, everywhere and always. Saint Paul taught in the Epistle to the Romans that the natural law is inscribed on the heart of every man. (Rom. 2:14-15)

It Always Denies a Child Either a Father or a Mother. It is in the child’s best interests that he be raised under the influence of his natural father and mother. This rule is confirmed by the evident difficulties faced by the many children who are orphans or are raised by a single parent, a relative, or a foster parent. The unfortunate situation of these children will be the norm for all children of a same-sex “marriage.” A child of a same-sex “marriage” will always be deprived of either his natural mother or father. He will necessarily be raised by one party who has no blood relationship with him. He will always be deprived of either a mother or a father role model.
Same-sex “marriage” ignores a child’s best interests.

It Validates and Promotes the Homosexual Lifestyle. In the name of the “family,” same-sex “marriage” serves to validate not only such unions but the whole homosexual lifestyle in all its bisexual and transgender variants. Civil laws are structuring principles of man’s life in society. As such, they play a very important and sometimes decisive role in influencing patterns of thought and behavior. They externally shape the life of society, but also profoundly modify everyone’s perception and evaluation of forms of behavior.
Legal recognition of same-sex “marriage” would necessarily obscure certain basic moral values, devalue traditional marriage, and weaken public morality.

It Turns a Moral Wrong into a Civil Right
Homosexual activists argue that same-sex “marriage” is a civil rights issue similar to the struggle for racial equality in the 1960s.
First of all, sexual behavior and race are essentially different realities. A man and a woman wanting to marry may be different in their characteristics: one may be black, the other white; one rich, the other poor; or one tall, the other short. None of these differences are insurmountable obstacles to marriage. The two individuals are still man and woman, and thus the requirements of nature are respected. Same-sex “marriage” opposes nature. Two individuals of the same sex, regardless of their race, wealth, stature, erudition or fame, will never be able to marry because of an insurmountable biological impossibility.

LMAO! WAT!!!!!!!!!

My folks. Around this peeps….i experience TRUE HAPPINESS

My folks. Around this peeps….i experience TRUE HAPPINESS


PSG, Chelsea Official Accounts Banter on Twitter and Facebook Before Big Match | Bleacher Report (via http://teamstre.am/1hfsieN

I dont know…..but i believe chelsea will win this match. Not because am a chelsea fan….but because we are the underdogs going into dis match

PSG, Chelsea Official Accounts Banter on Twitter and Facebook Before Big Match | Bleacher Report (via http://teamstre.am/1hfsieN